Women in Economics at Berkeley
  • Home
  • What we do
    • Research Seminars
    • Mentorship
    • Faculty Recruitment
    • Community Building
    • Summit for Diversity in Economics
  • News & Blog
  • About Us
    • Our Mission
    • Who we are
    • History
    • Joining WEB
  • Resources
    • Organizing At Your School
    • Reading List
    • FAQs
    • Creating Change as an Ally >
      • Seminars
      • Advising
      • Peer to Peer
      • Teaching
      • Hiring & Admissions
  • Who we are

On sexism in economics

8/23/2017

 
WEB Editorial Board
​

Most of us have probably seen coverage (New York Times, Washington Post) of an undergraduate honors thesis written by Berkeley undergraduate economics major, Alice Wu. In her paper, Wu exposes the rampant misogyny cluttering Economics Job Market Rumors (EJMR), an anonymous forum. While it comes as no great surprise that EJMR is rife with sexist (not to mention racist and homophobic) commentary, Wu's paper uses natural language processing to quantify the extent of the vitriol - and the results are disappointing. On the site, the words most commonly associated with women include "hotter," "lesbian", and "feminazi", while the words most commonly associated with men tend to be positive ("goals", "greatest") or economics-related ("adviser", "textbook", "pricing"). At WEB, we condemn in the strongest possible terms the rampant sexism on EJMR.
The commentary and attitudes on display at EJMR represent a substantial challenge to women in economics - (explicit) bias - which can discourage women from undergoing graduate training, prevent them from entering academia upon graduation, and hamper the careers of female economists. Even though EJMR clearly does not represent the views of all economists, the anonymous trolling on the site does represent real issues in the profession, and is a "canary in the coal-mine for what happens every day" (Amitabh Chandra).

While it is undoubtedly true that not all men post on it, almost  *all* women (that I know) have experienced their names be publicly associated with sexist, offensive, and untrue claims.
-Maya Rossin-Slater

​Furthermore, it is concerning that anybody associated with academic economics use the language described in Wu’s paper to describe women. The existence of this website sends a message to the population that economists do not take misogyny (or racism, classism, etc.) seriously. 
Not personally participating in this harmful behavior cannot serve as an excuse or rationale for inaction -- especially when the language used at EJMR is viewed in the broader context of women’s experiences in the economics profession. There is mounting empirical evidence that women in economics often face uphill battles. Women get less credit for coauthored work (Sarsons 2017); despite having more readable abstracts, female economists' papers take six months longer to peer review in a top journal (Hengel 2016); and women are more likely to take on department service that does not contribute to promotion (Babcock et al 2017) The share of women by PhD cohorts has stagnated for the past decade (Daniel Paserman), and women are underrepresented in economics - even relative to other STEM fields (Bayer & Rouse 2016).

We knew it, now the data show it. Econ Job Market Rumors is a violently misogynistic cesspool.
-Susan Dynarski
I totally agree #EJMR is toxic, & with this sentiment: "more women should be in [economics] changing the landscape."
-Jennifer Doleac

​A lack of diversity in the economics field - potentially exacerbated by the kind of language found on EJMR - is a serious problem (See Bayer & Rouse 2016 for more on this). Wu's paper itself serves as a reminder of the importance of including women’s voices in economics: she brought creative methods to a sensitive topic, and sparked a much-needed conversation on gender disparity.
Economists throughout the profession have spoken out over the past few days against EJMR. The discussion among economists, across twitter and personal blogs, has extended to the state of gender disparity in economics as a whole. By rejecting discriminatory and harmful actions, senior faculty and prominent economists send a clear message to young up-and-coming economists that economics does not stand for bigotry.

This is a point worth emphasizing. Senior Econ should denounce racist, sexist, homophobic trolling on EJMR. Young people are listening. https://t.co/ieBgtIoyZC

— Shelly Lundberg (@ShellyJLundberg) August 19, 2017

I always thought EJMR was awful, but the way female economists are covered is beyond disgraceful. Terrible. Not proud of economists today https://t.co/zIDwihtMM7

— Stefano DellaVigna (@sdellavi) August 18, 2017

Future Econ PhDs, esp women & POC: I can't promise you won't run into EJMR-types, but when you do, I've got your back #onhere & #outthere https://t.co/dlp2iG5F4f

— Damon Jones (@nomadj1s) August 19, 2017
​We applaud the ongoing commentary that condemns the unacceptable culture at EJMR. We urge the economics profession to take advantage of this conversation and take further action. Several suggestions have already been floated. 

This editorial was contributed by Emily Eisner, Fiona Burlig, and Aluma Dembo

    Archives

    October 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    March 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016

    Categories

    All
    Article Review
    Discussion
    Faculty Hiring
    Grad Admissions
    Tenure

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.
  • Home
  • What we do
    • Research Seminars
    • Mentorship
    • Faculty Recruitment
    • Community Building
    • Summit for Diversity in Economics
  • News & Blog
  • About Us
    • Our Mission
    • Who we are
    • History
    • Joining WEB
  • Resources
    • Organizing At Your School
    • Reading List
    • FAQs
    • Creating Change as an Ally >
      • Seminars
      • Advising
      • Peer to Peer
      • Teaching
      • Hiring & Admissions
  • Who we are